Unba//anced


seriously?

President Bush regrets his legacy as man who wanted war
from the Times Online

President Bush has admitted to The Times that his gun-slinging rhetoric made the world believe that he was a “guy really anxious for war” in Iraq. He said that his aim now was to leave his successor a legacy of international diplomacy for tackling Iran.

In an exclusive interview, he expressed regret at the bitter divisions over the war and said that he was troubled about how his country had been misunderstood. “I think that in retrospect I could have used a different tone, a different rhetoric.”

Phrases such as “bring them on” or “dead or alive”, he said, “indicated to people that I was, you know, not a man of peace”. He said that he found it very painful “to put youngsters in harm’s way”. He added: “I try to meet with as many of the families as I can. And I have an obligation to comfort and console as best as I possibly can. I also have an obligation to make sure that those lives were not lost in vain.”

The unilateralism that marked his first White House term has been replaced by an enthusiasm for tough multilateralism. He said that his focus for his final six months in office was to secure agreement on issues such as establishing a Palestinian state and to “leave behind a series of structures that makes it easier for the next president”. more
i can't even comment on this. there are no words to even describe everything going on in my head over his words. tho my friend angie said it best in the subject line of the email she sent me this article: "portrait of a pathological liar"


current mood: battling an allergy attack
current noise: "race in" by battles

1 responses to “seriously?”

  1. # Anonymous Anonymous

    He said that he found it very painful “to put youngsters in harm’s way”.

    huh. maybe he SHOULDN'T HAVE then.  

Post a Comment


things i dig...


the circus
ninety-five
starcherone books
     

archives...